"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free....... ~Ronald Reagan~
Thursday, November 30, 2006
Wednesday, November 29, 2006
Tuesday, November 28, 2006
Liberals for Hugo Chavez and Citgo
Mr. Chávez's Citgo -- a Houston-based oil company owned by the Venezuelan government -- is supplying home heating oil to Mr. Kennedy's Citizens Energy Corporation at a 40% discount. Citizens, a nonprofit outfit, says it passes the savings onto the poor, aiming to help 400,000 homes in 16 states that would otherwise have trouble heating their homes. In the process, Mr. Kennedy happens to get a high-profile publicity plug. If you think you qualify, says the television ad that drew our attention to this partnership, just dial 1-877-Joe-4-Oil.
Freebies to the poor is what dictators do best to keep these people in line and dependent to the tyrants and terrorist organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah. This ilk uses hospitals, schools, food and other items to allow their heavy hand to choke off freedoms and allow individuals the power to crawl out of their poor circumstances. Keeping people poor and beholden to government handout or terrorist groups is what diminishes the desire to become self-sufficient. Hugo Chávez takes care of his poor and keeps them poor, despite the billions of dollars in oil revenue his government receives.
There is more coming out of Massachusetts however:
In a September 29, 2005, "confidential memorandum" addressed to President Hugo Chávez" and uncovered by a Congressional committee, William Delahunt (D., Mass.) gushed that it was a "pleasure" to have met with the strongman "to discuss your generous offer." The Democrat advised Mr. Chávez to steer his oil through Mr. Kennedy's nonprofit and declared that "from a public relations perspective" the discount oil scheme "is an extraordinary opportunity to address urgent needs of people living in poverty, while showcasing the compassion of your nation."
If Democrats wish to improve their image as tax and spend Liberals they could start with an energy bill that has teeth. Drilling in ANWAR, drilling offshore, promoting more refineries and incentives for energy efficient automobiles would be a fine start.
Maybe Kennedy can work out a deal for American drinkers of Scotch. Single-Malt if possible, oh please! Oh Yes, Yes, maybe some nice Cuban cigars too.
Monday, November 27, 2006
Porker of the Month
Saturday, November 25, 2006
Culture of Corruption - Fox Guarding the Chicken Coop
.....bans on gifts and meals from lobbyists and lobbying organizations, and more frequent reports by lobbyists disclosing for whom and what they are working. In disclosure reports, which lobbyists currently are required to file with Congress at least once a year, they also spell out how much they have been paid for their efforts.Former members who become registered lobbyists would be prohibited from seeking help on legislation from their congressional colleagues for two years and denied access to the House and Senate floors. Today, lawmakers-turned-lobbyists can mingle with their former colleagues inside the chambers during debates and votes.The proposed packages in both the House and Senate would curtail, if not ban, travel paid for by lobbyists and organizations that lobby. House leaders say they would prohibit lawmakers from using corporate planes for official travel. Both chambers are expected to require members to identify hometown projects they insert into spending bills.
Thursday, November 23, 2006
The Mayflower Compact
Wednesday, November 22, 2006
Lebanese Blood, Syrian Hands
- Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, was blown up with 22 others in February 2005.
- Journalist Samir Kassir was blown up by a car bomb in June 2005.
- Three weeks later, politician George Hawi was killed by a car bomb three weeks after Kassir.
- Defense Minister Elias Murr narrowly survived a car bombing.
- In September 2005, TV anchorwoman May Chidiac lost her left leg and arm in a car-bombing.
- Three months later, Gibran Tueni, a former publisher and editor of the An-Nahar newspaper, was killed by a car bomb.
- Six pro-Syrian politicians in the Lebanese cabinet recently resigned en masse in an attempt to cripple the government.
- Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah has been threatening huge demonstrations to bring down the anti-Syrian Prime Minister Fuad Siniora.
Mr. Baker hasn't been specific about diplomacy with Syria and Iran but sleeping with the enemy doesn't seem like a valid path to peace without selling our soul to the devil first.
Tuesday, November 21, 2006
Liberals Wish List - Playing Robin Hood
- Technology is increasing employers' need for some skilled workers, while diminishing it for assembly-line workers.
- Schools aren't graduating enough of the workers in short supply, such as engineers, which creates a greater need for outsourcing.
Taking from the rich and give to the poor does not balance the playing field. Forcing business to pay higher wages for unskilled labor may cost jobs before it provides income to the worker on the low end of the pay scale. Employers may decide to trim their payroll or pass the cost on to consumers. Someone must pay for this form of government tariff on domestic business.
In the Democrats playbook, "A new social contract for the 21st century" the authors Bruce Reed and Rahm Emanuel suggest requiring companies that provide stock options to their executives to provide stock options to every worker. The operative word here is "require" as in government regulation.
Liberals don't want a fence to stop illegal immigration but they do want a fence built to reduce imports, free trade and participating in a global economy. In addition, Liberals want to pass legislation empowering unions. Look what unions did for the Big 3 auto makers.
The glass is always half-empty for Liberals. Instead of creating incentives for people to climb out of the ranks of unskilled or poor they want someone else to prop them up with "private" welfare checks in the form of entitlements and punishing success to aid failure, lack of motivation or laziness.
Liberals don't like free markets as much as they like a free lunch. They believe it's necessary to have an "activist" government for broad-based economic growth. Liberals believe socialism creates equity for the poor and balances the inequities of a free society.
Here is a list of the Democrats proposal to provide aid and comfort the the have-nots at the expense of the haves:
- Raise minimum wage
- Restrain CEO pay
- Strengthen union clout
- Expand earned income tax credits
- Roll back the Bush upper income tax cuts
- Raise taxes on dividends and capital gains
- Increase grants to low income college students
- Cut interest rates on student loans
- Expand public pre-kindergarten programs
- Expand wage-loss insurance
- Revamp unemployment insurance system
- Cover mortgage payments for displaced workers
- Give cash to families whose incomes fall sharply
- Provide universal health insurance
- Allow small businesses to buy insurance from a government sponsored pool
- Provide universal 401(k) with government subsidies
Notice the key words: Government, subsidies, give, grants, low-income, tax, union clout, expand, cut.
If the Liberals get their way socialism will be alive and well in 21st Century America. Karl Marx would be proud.
Monday, November 20, 2006
Social Security Reform - In Reverse
Doing so would raise the marginal tax rate on the entrepreneurs that Mr. Bush credits for having led the economic recovery by more than 10 percentage points. The new effective rate would be five percentage points above the level when he took office. Moreover, in 2011, the rate would go up a further 4.3 percentage points to an effective 53% marginal rate on entrepreneurial income. The president would thus be not just raising taxes on entrepreneurs to well above the levels that prevailed in the Clinton administration, but to a rate higher than that which prevailed in the Carter administration. Most of the improved incentives for entrepreneurship and work brought about under Reagan would be repealed.
Friday, November 17, 2006
Milton Friedman - The Economic Model
A diminutive man known for his strong-willed and combative style, Mr. Friedman provided the intellectual foundations for the anti-inflation, tax-cutting and antigovernment policies of President Ronald Reagan and British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and an era of more-disciplined central banking. His ideas helped to end the military draft in the 1970s, gave birth to staple conservative causes such as school vouchers and created the groundwork for new economic views about the Great Depression, unemployment, inflation and exchange rates.xxx"Among economic scholars, Milton Friedman had no peer," Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said yesterday. "The direct and indirect influences of his thinking on contemporary monetary economics would be difficult to overstate. Just as important, in his humane and engaging way, Milton conveyed to millions an understanding of the economic benefits of free, competitive markets, as well as the close connection that economic freedoms bear to other types of liberty."
"No one in the 20th century has had the ideological influence that Milton Friedman has had in moving the economic profession from Great Depression-era do-goodism towards a friendliness toward, and appreciation of, the free market," said Paul Samuelson, a fellow Nobel laureate and frequent ideological opponent of Mr. Friedman. "We've lost a giant in economics."
Wednesday, November 15, 2006
Porker of the Month
Tuesday, November 14, 2006
Stay the Course or Father Knows Best?
- The Bush (41) administration brought Arabs and Israelis together for the Madrid Peace Conference, which set the groundwork for the Oslo Accords. These were touted as historic achievements, but for Israel it meant more terrorism, culminating in the second intifada, and for the Palestinians it meant repression in the person of Yasser Arafat and mass radicalization in the movement of Hamas. Worse, Mr. Baker fostered the fatal perception that the failure of Arabs and Jews to make peace was the root of the region's problems, not a symptom of them, and that the obstacle to peace was intransigent Israel, not militant Islam.
- Or take "Lawrence of Serbia," the moniker Mr. Eagleburger earned for his initial indulgence, as the State Department's point man on Yugoslav affairs during the early 1990s while the country was coming apart, of Serbia's Slobodan Milosevic. Mr. Eagleburger, who had longstanding business ties in Belgrade, spent the early period of the war largely ignoring Mr. Milosevic's depredations on his neighbors, including paramilitary slaughters in Vukovar and concentration camps in Omarska. "There was a kind of preference for stability and an attachment to the old Yugoslavia over our interests in human rights," Patrick Glynn of the American Enterprise Institute told Newsday in 1992, adding the administration had "been standing by, waiting while the final solution is played out."
- "Chicken Kiev," Mr. Bush's spectacularly misconceived August 1991 speech in what was shortly to become the capital of independent Ukraine. Mr. Bush's reluctance to acknowledge -- and better manage -- the breakup of Yugoslavia was partly a function of his reluctance to acknowledge the impending breakup of the Soviet Union and the fall from grace of his friend Mikhail Gorbachev. Once Mr. Gorbachev was gone, Mr. Bush was equally reluctant to help the new Russia get on its feet, prompting Richard Nixon to complain about the administration's "pathetically inadequate response in light of the opportunities we face in the crisis in the former Soviet Union."
- No Bush 41 failure was as great -- or as consequential -- as his apparently flip suggestion, following "victory" in the Gulf War, that the "Iraqi people . . . take matters into their own hands and force Saddam Hussein, the dictator, to step down." Tens of thousands of Shiites and Kurds took him seriously, and tens of thousands paid with their lives as Saddam quelled the revolt while the Bush administration stood by, lest it exceed its U.N. mandate.
Surely the long awaited Iraq Study Group pronouncements will weigh heavy on the former Bush foreign policy. However, in mid-stream, abandoning Iraq now would mirror our exit from Vietnam and turn Iraq chaos into Islamic extremisms and establish formal training ground for these groups.
John McCain (R-AZ) contends that the war in Iraq is worth fighting and is worth winning. He has said consistently said from the start of the conflict that the only way to prevail is to send enough soldiers to do the job. His current proposal is to send 20,000 additional troops in hopes of bringing Baghdad and the restive western provinces under control.
The alternative, he said, is humiliation for the United States and disaster for Iraq. This reflects the left-wing attitude using terms as quagmire and Vietnam. Liberals feel some wars are simply "unwinnable." That attitude is one of losers, misfits and certainly the "cut and run" policy of the left.
Cutting losses in Iraq now will certainly have extreme negative effects in the long-term and it will take strength and vision to address today's issues in Iraq and corrective action, not evacuation and abandonment.
“We’re paying a price for the failure of our policy in the past,” Mr. McCain said Sunday on “Meet the Press” on NBC, “and the question, then, before the American people is, are we ready to quit? And I believe the consequences of failure are chaos in the region, which will spread.”
Certainly McCain supports much of what has been written on these pages time and time again as the Senator told Tim Russert on Meet the Press:
The [Iraq] prime minister [Maliki] has to understand that we need to put down Sadr, and we need to take care of the Mahdi Army, and we need to stop the sectarian violence that is on the increase in an unacceptable level. And I think that the best way to assure that is for him to know that we will do what’s necessary to bolster the—train and equip the Iraqi army, etc. If we send the signal that we are leaving, of course he’s going to try to make accommodations with others, because he knows that—what is going to be the inevitable result. So most politicians in that part of the world are interested in survival, so I, I can understand why he took the position that he did, but I certainly disagree with it strongly.
McCain is absolutely correct in his premise. The chaos in Iraq is internal with the clerics and their militias operating unfettered. Eliminate the militias and much of the armed conflict will end. Maliki is feckless at best and is beholden to whatever secures his survival. He needs to be given an ultimatum and follow our lead, which should be McCains plan.
A Reader Defends Howard Dean
In Howard Dean Tells Us What America Wants I suggest the DNC chairman and left-wing nut feels the recent election has given Liberals a mandate for change. Mr. Dean is arrogant as well as confused. I also took on Robert Rubin for his recent suggestion the eonomy could withstand a tax increase. Nice advice but it's refreshing to have the support of the Wall Street Journal to back my reasoning. However one reader, Joe in Wynnewood said...
Of course Liberals never provide specifics nor do they corroborate their bluster with facts. Let's help Joe out:
Isn't that true only in terms of real and not inflation adjusted $? I know it isn't in terms of % of GDP. Isn't it true that expenditures have way outstripped revenue under the fiscally-challenged Congress and nary a veto in sight from Bush?
I didn't know that free market meant that when the government pays for stuff it can't do what every business in America does when it buys from suppliers - negotiate for the best possible terms. When a government agency is acting as a business, shouldn't it act as a business?
Maybe Gov. Dean isn't quite as crazy as you'd like to make him out to be...
- Federal revenues in fiscal 2006 were 18.4% of GDP, higher than the 18.2% post-1965 average.
- The U.S. economy grew by an average of nearly 4% a year for three years following mid-2003.
- Federal revenues in fiscal 2006 were 18.4% of GDP, higher than the 18.2% post-1965 average.
- In October, the first month of fiscal 2007, revenues rose by 12% from a year earlier.
- The federal deficit for fiscal 2006 was only 1.9% of GDP, which is lower than all but eight years since 1975.
- During the late Clinton years, the feds grabbed a record 20.9% of GDP.
Hopefully Bush '43' will not follow in Bush '41s' footsteps and pronounce, "No new taxes" and tell us to "Read his lips." This is what the Liberals like Dean, Rubin and Hillary Clinton wish for, have Republicans change tax policy and take the issue off the table for 2008.
If the electorate spoke in volumes then Democrats didn't win the election or receive a mandate. Republicans forgot Conservative principles and lost the election. The long awaited Liberal agenda was not part of the election campaign, it is now rearing its ugly head.
Republican politicians should now remind themselves of Conservative policies and recall the Tom Delay folly in the house. Earmarks should be dead, and tax cuts should be permanent. As for Joe? We don't want the government paying for "stuff." We want our money and control of it. Read my lips!
Democrats Meddling in Business - Again
Sunday, November 12, 2006
Howard Dean Tells Us What America Wants
Saturday, November 11, 2006
Honor Our Veterans
Friday, November 10, 2006
Good Riddance Lincoln
Republicans Need New Leadership
"Republicans Need New Leadership." That is an understatement and the Wall Street Journal provides a look back and sound advice for the future. xxx
As they lick their wounds, Republicans are no doubt wondering what went wrong and what to do now. The answers aren't all that complicated: Revive the reform convictions that earned them power in the 1990s, and start that process in the House of Representatives by electing a new slate of leaders.xxx Twelve years ago, the Newt Gingrich-led Republicans swept into power as reformers who ran against corruption and pledged to make government "smaller and smarter."Somehow, across the years, that conviction was replaced by Tom DeLay and the quest for permanent incumbency, Appropriations Chairman Jerry Lewis and the "earmark" brigade, and a retinue of Beltway retainers symbolized by Jack Abramoff. The current leadership let it all happen, and if Republicans want a shot at regaining control in 2008 they'll turn to a new generation to lead them.xxxAs a minority party in Congress, Republicans must operate as the party of change, not of Washington insiders willing to sign away their principles for a courthouse or swimming pool in the home district. This doesn't mean they shouldn't work with Democrats when it makes policy sense. But they need to reclaim their fiscal conservative birthright.xxx Republicans also need to rediscover an agenda for reforming government programs that don't work or threaten to bankrupt future generations. The Gingrich Republicans did that with welfare reform in the 1990s, and they tried with Medicaid. Then President Bush gave Republicans a once-in-a-generation chance to reform Social Security and health care along free market lines, but GOP House leaders fought him behind the scenes. For this alone, they should be returned to the back benches.
Thursday, November 09, 2006
Will President Bush Eat His Lunch
- Troops out of Iraq, now.
- Higher minimum wages
- Healthcare for everyone.
- Tax the rich and not so rich that Liberals label rich.
- Tax the small business owner with a minimum wage hike.
- A tax hike to fit the small business owner into the Liberal "rich" bracket.
- Higher corporate taxes.
- Raise the Capital Gains tax.
- Raise the Estate (Death) tax.
- Double tax married couples.
The Liberal agenda is a Dennis Kucinich agenda, a Harry Reid agenda, a Nancy Pelosi agenda, a Left-Wing Nut agenda.
My advice Mr. President...........Watch your backside, they're coming after you!
America, watch you're pocket book, it's about to be lifted.
Rumsfeld as a Scapegoat
Blue Dog Democrat Watch - Sheep in Wolves Clothing?
Rep. Harold Ford, Jr. (TN-09) Rep. Jane Harman (CA-36) Rep. Stephanie Herseth (SD) Rep. Tim Holden (PA-17) Rep. Steve Israel (NY-02) Rep. Mike McIntyre (NC-07) Rep. Jim Marshall (GA-03) Rep. Jim Matheson (UT-02), Blue Dog Co-Chair for Administration Rep. Charlie Melancon (LA-03) Rep. Mike Michaud (ME-02) Rep. Dennis Moore (KS-03) Rep. Collin Peterson (MN-07)
Rep. Earl Pomeroy (ND) Rep. Mike Ross (AR-04) , Blue Dog Whip Rep. John Salazar (C0-03) Rep. Loretta Sanchez (CA-47) Rep. Adam Schiff (CA-29) Rep. David Scott (GA-13) Rep. John Tanner (TN-08) Rep. Ellen Tauscher (CA-10) Rep. Gene Taylor (MS-04) Rep. Mike Thompson (CA-01)
Wednesday, November 08, 2006
Donald Rumsfeld Resigning